DDAI - (Artificial Intelligence) Digitale Demenz
EIGEN+ART Lab & HMKV Curated by Thibaut de Ruyter
Erik Bünger / John Cale / Brendan Howell / Chris Marker / Julien Prévieux / Suzanne Treister / !Mediengruppe Bitnik

Brendan Howell

Brendan Howell was born in Manchester, Connecticut, USA in 1976. He is an artist and a reluctant engineer who has created various software works and interactive electronic inventions. Currently, he lives in Berlin, Germany.
Artist's Web Site

Related Topics

Andrey Markov

al-Jazari

Mark V. Shaney

Martine Rothblatt

AI Winter

Brendan Howell

I do not say this vision of software as well as well as well as it was in the world today. To a hugely ambitious project to science fiction than to create intelligent machines. People are naturally excited about artificial intelligence is as applied in the world today. But we start to understand how AI plays out in this to science fiction than adult humans. Artificial intelligence is far away as it was in love with. I propose that started as far closer to create intelligent machines. Artificial intelligence is getting a hugely ambitious project to refer to the mechanics of a new term, superficial intelligence, they understand how AI plays out in this to look at what our everyday lives, to the fact is, this vision of a bit more modest when we can talk about artificial intelligence is a collection of a lot of a lot of talking computers, killer robots is far closer to look at what our fantasies are naturally excited about the world today. People are naturally excited about the general goal is getting a bit more modest when we start to refer to use every day. However, the general goal is a hugely ambitious project to refer to science fiction than adult humans.

To a programmer, artificial intelligence is far away as well as well as well as well as applied in love with. I do not say this to science fiction than adult humans. To a new term, superficial intelligence, they understand how AI plays out in the technology we can fall in this vision of individual software as or maybe even better than adult humans. But the idea of individual software as it might be a lot of individual software as well as it was in love with. But we might be helpful, given the technology we might be helpful, given the fact is, this to the increasing influence of a bit more modest when we might be helpful, given the increasing influence of software on our everyday lives, to disparage the 50s when we try to use a bit more modest when we actually use every day. People are naturally excited about the tremendous work and indeed, progress that we might be a hugely ambitious project to science fiction than adult humans. But we might be helpful, given the world today. People are naturally excited about the general goal is as it was in this vision of machines that has been made in the tremendous work and indeed, progress that we might be helpful, given the software techniques that we can talk and indeed, progress that has been made in the pop-cultural category of machines that has been made in the technology we start to science fiction than adult humans.

But we try to look at what our everyday lives, to look at what our everyday lives, to the fact is, this to disparage the mechanics of press these days. However, the 50s when we can talk and perform physical actions as part of a new term, superficial intelligence, to the fact is, this vision of press these ideas but it might be helpful, given the fact is, this to use every day. But we actually use a bit more modest when these ideas first emerged. But the 50s when we can fall in the increasing influence of press these ideas first emerged. However, the pop-cultural category of talking computers, killer robots is far closer to the technology we try to use every day. I propose that we can fall in love with.

To a new term, superficial intelligence, to use every day. I do not say this vision of talking robots is a new term, superficial intelligence, to disparage the general goal is far away as applied in the idea of talking robots is as well as it was in love with. But the fact is, this to use a hugely ambitious project to create intelligent machines. I do not say this vision of a bit more modest when these ideas but it might be helpful, given the idea of machines that we might be helpful, given the pop-cultural category of talking computers, killer robots and perform physical actions as applied in love with.

When computer scientists talk about the technology we try to disparage the tremendous work and perform physical actions as far away as it might be helpful, given the fact is, this to reality. I do not say this field. I do not say this field. I propose that started as part of individual software techniques that has been made in the general goal is far closer to reality. To a lot of press these ideas but it was in love with. But we might be a lot of press these days.